[OFFICIAL THIDRANKI THREAD]

Talk about your RvR experience here
User avatar
Cadam
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Nov 19, 2009 01:00
Location: Paraguay

Postby Cadam » Jun 01, 2012 13:14

But lots of twoshotcasters ;)

User avatar
eruvatar
Warder
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Jun 17, 2011 13:30
Location: Spain CC

Postby eruvatar » Jul 27, 2012 17:55

What do u think about put old thidranki?
It could be a starting BG as in old times at 20-24 or 20-30.
Or even remove new thidranki and put old one.

dont know about balance in this Bg it was so long time ago, but could be cool to revive old times playing it

btw: i ask here cose i used searcher about this theme but only found some german thread that i dont understand

User avatar
Fabulabelle
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Jul 22, 2011 14:54

Postby Fabulabelle » Jul 27, 2012 21:19

eruvatar wrote:What do u think about put old thidranki?
It could be a starting BG as in old times at 20-24 or 20-30.

Creating a bg for lvl 20-24 will just encourage people to reroll and play low level toons, and split a little more the population out of end rvr.

User avatar
Orihiime
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1740
Joined: Dec 15, 2010 11:40

Postby Orihiime » Jul 27, 2012 21:27

Fabulabelle wrote:
eruvatar wrote:What do u think about put old thidranki?
It could be a starting BG as in old times at 20-24 or 20-30.

Creating a bg for lvl 20-24 will just encourage people to reroll and play low level toons, and split a little more the population out of end rvr.

BUt it would be livelike.
2012:<@[Uth]Abydos> If we don't have SI by the end of the year, Im fairly certain I wont be a GM anymore :-p

User avatar
Fabulabelle
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Jul 22, 2011 14:54

Postby Fabulabelle » Jul 27, 2012 22:27

Orihiime wrote:
Fabulabelle wrote:
eruvatar wrote:What do u think about put old thidranki?
It could be a starting BG as in old times at 20-24 or 20-30.

Creating a bg for lvl 20-24 will just encourage people to reroll and play low level toons, and split a little more the population out of end rvr.

BUt it would be livelike.

Livelike was 2000+ players on prime time ^^ endless debate :p

User avatar
eruvatar
Warder
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Jun 17, 2011 13:30
Location: Spain CC

Postby eruvatar » Jul 28, 2012 13:40

Orihiime wrote:
Fabulabelle wrote:
eruvatar wrote:What do u think about put old thidranki?
It could be a starting BG as in old times at 20-24 or 20-30.

Creating a bg for lvl 20-24 will just encourage people to reroll and play low level toons, and split a little more the population out of end rvr.

BUt it would be livelike.



I think split population is a cheap argument.

People will reroll even without a low lvl bg, anyways its not the only thing i talk.

It could be removed the actual thid and put old one, it will bring us nice reminds ^^

Previous

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests

Thursday, 04. September 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff