-l- Edgtho -l- wrote:but atm we dont have old RA´sand so we dont use 1.69.
a bug is a bug and have to get fixed doesnt matter which patch date (for example pets can activate enemy proccs... was toa fix, but STILL A BUGFIX!)

I think all fixes by the staff will be made accordingly to patch 1.69. Otherwise they would have double the work ... after patching downgrading again would be necessary.

and i rly think that zhinquiri remembers the salis hunter (even before imbapets!) okay there was a bit more advantage with overcaps a.s.o. but some hunters even rocked at those times (no, not aillienas gimptard ^^)

You can realy not compare Uthgard with Salis Just as example: On Salis, my NS had around 2200 HP buffed with CL5. My ranger here comes to 1500.

but honestly i wish they would make uth a salis like server not the freaking lotm and so on but still overcaps etc, so the game was way more balanced and noone NOONE had a 100% capped template.

other way i would go is remove si bullshit and do it classik pure w/o template bullshit.

and zhin, they dont look for 1.69 atm, now we got our 1.74 and nothing else!

all i want for hunter is blue´s long awaited (and never implemented) petfix (wohoo u do 20 dmg thats even 200% more than before doggy!)
and a custom ws fix (if u dont get it blue , then just try it and learn from mistakes -.-)
everything else i dont care for, okay maybe give us back the 75er charges and redo your dmg formula because stats make to much dmg and weaponskill to less...

but whatever, i know that nothing will change here (instead of weaponcolors and inventory or questfixes - U EVER SEEN SOMEONE DOING A LVL10 QUEST IN CONNLA? i didnt...) and i dont care about anymore.
uth staff signed their own downfall.

mfg -l- Edgtho -l-

Garad wrote:

-l- Edgtho -l- wrote:but atm we dont have old RA´sand so we dont use 1.69.
a bug is a bug and have to get fixed doesnt matter which patch date (for example pets can activate enemy proccs... was toa fix, but STILL A BUGFIX!)

I think all fixes by the staff will be made accordingly to patch 1.69. Otherwise they would have double the work ... after patching downgrading again would be necessary.

/german:
ein BUGfix sollte nicht patch abhängig gemacht werden, ein bug ist ein bug und sollte gefixt werden, egal welcher patchstand es gerade ist und welchen patchstand es gefixt wurde.
sollte man hier anderer meinung sein und alte bugs neu implementieren aufgrund des patchstandes, dann [sprachlos].
/german off

-l- Edgtho -l- wrote:but whatever, i know that nothing will change here (instead of weaponcolors and inventory or questfixes - U EVER SEEN SOMEONE DOING A LVL10 QUEST IN CONNLA? i didnt...) and i dont care about anymore.

I do them for example Cause that was the playstyle on classic Powerlvling was later