NICE PICS MOTARO - GOOD SIZE SCREENSHOTS

weren't you the same guy who said zerk dmg wasn't much higher than merc/bm..

Glacius wrote:You talk about the proc.. its low, doesnt even compare with reaver one. I think i make max 140 dmg fully bufed ona target with 26% res and around 100 vs a target with full res.

Sup?

bawww wrote:

Glacius wrote:You talk about the proc.. its low, doesnt even compare with reaver one. I think i make max 140 dmg fully bufed ona target with 26% res and around 100 vs a target with full res.

Sup?

My bad, i make 140 fully bufed VS targets with 50% res, when i solo i dont hit for more then 140 vs a 26% cold res, now i had sham

Neju wrote:NICE PICS MOTARO - GOOD SIZE SCREENSHOTS

weren't you the same guy who said zerk dmg wasn't much higher than merc/bm..

THNX! ) What can i say, augm str and beeing troll with 240+ str unbufed helps,+10% relic .. its insane and if u believe me i dont like it, before with albs or hibs having str relics was a challenge at least.

you obviously don't get the joke...

you say dmg is fine when you compare your unbuffed dmg to a fully buffed merc

Midgard logic!

Neju wrote:you obviously don't get the joke...

you say dmg is fine when you compare your unbuffed dmg to a fully buffed merc

Midgard logic!

What i compared was me fully bufed vs a fully bufed merc. Probl on alb is that growth of styles is not so big like on laxe , we r VIKINGS ! not lasy ass britons from camelot who start dueling at lvl 50..we do it from lvl 1 !: ))) thats why we have better growth rates.

Wasn't this aurora borealis proc hitting for like 80 damage on live anyway ?

Hedra wrote:Wasn't this aurora borealis proc hitting for like 80 damage on live anyway ?

NOw it has around same dmg once buffed.

Weird that on zerk videos from 2005 I see damages like 65(-24) with this proc then. Not to mention those zerks seem to have lower melee damage on a TOA server (so with melee damage bonus, style damage bonus, str overcapped and red capped buffs) than what zerks sometimes do on uthgard ^^

jesus I'm just sick of the way people greet and treat newcomers!

don't roll that realm, you'll get frustrated.
don't roll an armsman, it's damage sucks.
noone likes ice wizzies in RvR, don't play that.
yeah, theurgist is good, just don't spec earth or ice... you can spec air but some pets are bugged and your RR5 ability doesn't work, you'll suck solo and your only group role is rupting. but it's a good class!
oh, and don't roll a stealther. especially a scout! don't even dare!

just let people play whatever the fu*k they want, without turning every introduction thread into "roll Mid or mercenary/cleric". I thought people ought to think and learn for themselves...

Glacius wrote:come mid if u wana 3 shot bards and mercs )
Hahahaha........... , alb/hibs..plz come take relics i dont like daoc like this..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFoOTB8xNFU



P.S. sorry for the bad quality ^^

haha, think motaro didn't even pan when chasing you down the hill during SoS... he seemed to get a bit lost

Neju wrote:haha, think motaro didn't even pan when chasing you down the hill during SoS... he seemed to get a bit lost

yeah lol, my thoughts exactly

You don't need to pan when you have stick macro and doublefrost.

Totally not fair, you were getting instructions on ventrilo.

Toblerone wrote:You don't need to pan when you have stick macro and doublefrost.

Because of my position whe he ran sos-ing down i didnt see him i thought he ran AMG to recover )) .
Yes ..u blocked my stun style 2 times in this fight because of the super blockrate for clases with no shield spec:) and..nice basebufs:P leave bb home.. now i have the 10% melee ..i thnik u l need ip2 x 2 .

Toblerone wrote:You don't need to pan when you have stick macro and doublefrost.

You dont have /stick signed to your keyboard? If i have it macro its because of my play style.