Wizard Fire Bug
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
When I cast one fireball with the wizard seems that the damage is totally physical and not fire damage.
This is normal? |
|
This is a support question. Moved to support.
It's done when it's done. Thanks for your patience.
Every bug gets fixed. Sooner or later. "It is an inescapable law of nature that the amount of satisfaction one gains from achieving something is related to how hard it is and easy things can only elicit a fleeting superficial sort of pleasure." Blue says, "you used macro tools or macro keyboard" Pala says, "i am disabled. and i have a mechanic left hand that can be programed. its hard to play woith one hand" [Appeal] Bxxxxxxxx: "why is RA first aid cann man i stealth use and not unstealth cann man ra if man use unstealth ?????????" BannedUser: "i was not using automate game action my hand was fall on keyboard during i was sleep .... i was completly fall on keyboard ..." |
|
I see that root create Immunity for snare.. And the snare create immunity for root.
Is it normal? Nothing know wizard spell? |
|
nobody in ablion play wizard because of some bugs
there is a thread about wiz dmg: http://uthgard.net/de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=85&t=25909 Back to NF, NEW RA.
|
|
1/ about snare and root
actually if you look carefully on the root and snare spells you will notice that they share the same effect with a different dwelve like 40% for the snare and 99% for the root. So yes : their common immunity is normal and was patched later than SI (even after TOA if i'm not mistaken ![]() To notice : From the beginning and from memory, magical snare creates an immunity if it wears off or the cast sequence (snare/snare/snare...) is broken by another effect inflicting damages without a snare. I think but can't remember that you could chain the dd+snare and a root or the other way around without giving an immunity as long as the first rule wasn't broken which does not work on uthgard (fire wizz relies on dwelve where ice wizz and earth wizz rely on movement management). On the other hand, from classic, i remember that physical snare from weapon styles did not create an immunity so tanks can chain snare a running target. 2/ About spell dwelve on ice wizz BTW, i noticed something fishy while playing my ice wizz : dwelves are kindda bugged and resistance/variant dwelve per level difference is bugged too :'(. I explain myself. a/ in pve : noticed that the spell line spec level is not taken into account while counting resists and damage vary on mobs.
b/ in rvr : the resist rate seems "correct" : i did not notice that much unconsidered resists and must admit that it's always raging to mìss a kill for that but kinda normal :p c/ the spell level should be slightly taken into account considering the resist rate.
d/ a dd+debuff / 136.1 dwelve / lvl 37, should not do more damages in the considered configuration than a lvl 41 / base dd / 148 dwelve / lvl 41. Thought it could be a cast speed bug (base is 2.6 speed cast while spec DD+debuff is 3.0) but the spec DD+snare (148 dwelve, 3.0 speedcast, lvl 41) does same damage and variation than the base dd. Tried also this way the variation of base spell against spec spells => again the base and spec+snare lvl 41 do same damages, lower than lvl 37 spec+debuff. (think i even seen the base dd doing less damages after the debuff than the dd+debuf first shot ![]() e/ if a remember well on grey mobs the dwelve are at least in the "correct order" (base dd does more damages than dd+debuff), i think it begins to change near light blue mobs. f/ seen that bug effect since begining that toon with some variances (before gaining the lvl 37 dd+debuf i remember seeing the base dd doing more damages with 15% debuff than the dd+debuff for a while) g/ the 15% debuff seems to apply normaly (around 50 points damages on a 300 deal : don't have exact numbers in head but remember checking the xxx(-yyy) and seing that the yyy drop was kinda normal at first glance. h/ sometimes the PBAE deals even less damages point blanked or close than the dd+dbuff single :'( If i can help by doing tests i would be happy to ![]() thx for reading Last edited by dvonipaja on Apr 17, 2012 20:28, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
Can you please split your BTW section up with more space? It's really hard to read on this forum.
And tests are always needed to prove "how it's supposed to be" statements. |
|
done somehow
![]() hope it helps readability ^^ concerning the tests, i can provide uthgard tests only sorry ![]() btw i forgot mentionning % resists on sc when talking about rvr spell resists & efficiency ^^ don't know exactly how these are taken into account though ^^ (had the full formula once but can't exactly remember it ^^ was a looong time ago ![]() mobs do get % resists too if i'm not mistaken ? |
|
Anyone can test on Pendragon for free. See the bug report section for details on how to make a pendragon account without a live account. Testing on Uthgard does no good as we can see the code. What we need is live data. |
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests