Uthgard • View topic - Define "unacceptable behavior"

Define "unacceptable behavior"

13 posts • Page 1 of 1

Celi Myrmidon Posts: 94 Joined: Nov 09, 2008 01:00 Location: Germany	by Celi » Jun 19, 2011 23:11 "unacceptable behavior" .... "unacceptable behavior" Could anyone define that? Or is it just a ban reason for sarcasm/humor/bad mood? I would be happy about some answers Who are you?

Trishin Game Master Posts: 5048 Joined: Apr 07, 2010 00:00	by Trishin » Jun 19, 2011 23:16 This includes but is not excluded to: §1.3 Player obligations Players have the obligation to only connect and play on the Uthgard server within the Uthgard ruleset. §2.3 Staff authority The authority of the Uthgard staff is unimpeachable in all community parts. Staff decisions are to be followed and not to be discussed. Violations may result in punishments. In serious cases they may even result in a permanent ban. §2.7 Behavior towards the staff A player has to show basic respect towards members of staff. Any insults or threats against members of staff will result in punishments. Misleading or lying to a member of staff will also result in punishments. §2.11 Penalty calculation - "second instance" The penalty calculation and decision are in the free discretion of the acting staffmember. This includes the kind of punishment as well as the duration. If you do not agree with the penalty, you have to talk to the acting member of staff about the matter. If this does not help, you may contact the administration as “second instance”. Write an email to nayru [at] uthgard-server.net or send a private message in the forum. You may not post or discuss the problem in the IRC, forum or other community parts. Such behavior won't be tolerated and will be punished. §2.12 Negative behavior on the gameserver or in other community parts In a case of negative behavior of a player on the gameserver or in other parts of the Uthgard community, the staff has the right to take actions without a written rule that prohibits the behavior/action. The staff has the right to punish the acting player if necessary. §2.14 Account-relatedness of punishments In case of a rule violation, all accounts of the player who violated the rule will be affected, regardless of the kind or duration of the punishment. §3.1 Ingame behavior between players Players have to abstain from using insults, harassing, threats, compromisings and spam. This especially includes racist, nationalistic, ethnic, religious and sexistic harassments. It is not allowed to defame someone abouthis disabilities and origins. Violations of the rule will be punished and can result in permanent bans. §4.3 Consequences of punishments in other community parts Negative behavior of a player in one community part may effect the player in other community parts of Uthgard as well (forum, IRC, gameserver). This means for example that a negative behavior in the forum may have effects on the ingame account of the player as well. This is just to name a few of the rules that is in effect regarding the ban of Winkz

Celi Myrmidon Posts: 94 Joined: Nov 09, 2008 01:00 Location: Germany	by Celi » Jun 19, 2011 23:19 Pump. Waiting for an answer. Who are you?

Celi Myrmidon Posts: 94 Joined: Nov 09, 2008 01:00 Location: Germany	by Celi » Jun 19, 2011 23:20 Trishin wrote:This includes but is not excluded to: §1.3 Player obligations Players have the obligation to only connect and play on the Uthgard server within the Uthgard ruleset. §2.3 Staff authority The authority of the Uthgard staff is unimpeachable in all community parts. Staff decisions are to be followed and not to be discussed. Violations may result in punishments. In serious cases they may even result in a permanent ban. §2.7 Behavior towards the staff A player has to show basic respect towards members of staff. Any insults or threats against members of staff will result in punishments. Misleading or lying to a member of staff will also result in punishments. §2.11 Penalty calculation - "second instance" The penalty calculation and decision are in the free discretion of the acting staffmember. This includes the kind of punishment as well as the duration. If you do not agree with the penalty, you have to talk to the acting member of staff about the matter. If this does not help, you may contact the administration as “second instance”. Write an email to nayru [at] uthgard-server.net or send a private message in the forum. You may not post or discuss the problem in the IRC, forum or other community parts. Such behavior won't be tolerated and will be punished. §2.12 Negative behavior on the gameserver or in other community parts In a case of negative behavior of a player on the gameserver or in other parts of the Uthgard community, the staff has the right to take actions without a written rule that prohibits the behavior/action. The staff has the right to punish the acting player if necessary. §2.14 Account-relatedness of punishments In case of a rule violation, all accounts of the player who violated the rule will be affected, regardless of the kind or duration of the punishment. §3.1 Ingame behavior between players Players have to abstain from using insults, harassing, threats, compromisings and spam. This especially includes racist, nationalistic, ethnic, religious and sexistic harassments. It is not allowed to defame someone abouthis disabilities and origins. Violations of the rule will be punished and can result in permanent bans. §4.3 Consequences of punishments in other community parts Negative behavior of a player in one community part may effect the player in other community parts of Uthgard as well (forum, IRC, gameserver). This means for example that a negative behavior in the forum may have effects on the ingame account of the player as well. This is just to name a few of the rules that is in effect regarding the ban of Winkz Sarcasm means insult and bad behavior? Who are you?

Trishin Game Master Posts: 5048 Joined: Apr 07, 2010 00:00	by Trishin » Jun 19, 2011 23:26 Celi you might as well drop this one. Winkz have shown that he has no place on Uthgard with his behavior plenty of times. This last sarcasm / bad behavior was just the tip of the iceberg which gave him the perm ban. Nothing more to discuss.

Celi Myrmidon Posts: 94 Joined: Nov 09, 2008 01:00 Location: Germany	by Celi » Jun 19, 2011 23:26 Just for you information, copy paste isn't a definition. Not in that way!? Who are you?

Celi Myrmidon Posts: 94 Joined: Nov 09, 2008 01:00 Location: Germany	by Celi » Jun 19, 2011 23:28 The thing is that you told me some time ago, you dont like him. There is my suspicion. Who are you?

Rasta! Myrmidon Posts: 97 Joined: Dec 20, 2010 04:05	by Rasta! » Jun 20, 2011 00:28 winkz is a great guy, and he makes a lot of people laugh with his light hearted humour. Even the person who'se the "final straw" insult was based at KNEW he was joking and actually found it funny.... the question remains chaps: Who watches the watchers? UNBAN WINKZ!

Oswaldo Phoenix Knight Posts: 1503 Joined: Apr 10, 2011 22:53	by Oswaldo » Jun 20, 2011 00:31 - Honey Badgers - Winkz

Snigel Eagle Knight Posts: 564 Joined: Jun 19, 2009 00:00 Location: M A R S	by Snigel » Jun 20, 2011 01:43 Ban Celican Satas Hakx - various artists

pweet Lion Knight Posts: 4243 Joined: Dec 22, 2010 14:07	by pweet » Jun 20, 2011 02:01 Srsly he is not funny at all but flaming like hell. He deserved a perma ban and i am happy playing w/o him. I think he can ve a lot of fun on Domini or Faith server, the community there matches more his style. Win win for all.

Celteen Alerion Knight Posts: 2326 Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:52	by Celteen » Jun 20, 2011 02:05 Winkz was just a irc flamer who didn't get anything done ingame, so he did what he could do best - flaming either ingame or irc. Hence I'm really happy and ask myself how it could take that long to give him a one way ticket to faith / dominivm <<< This avatar is handmade by Inotor Wurzelbert : ) Check out the Mampfer-Threads for more. viewtopic.php?f=10&t=25079 viewtopic.php?f=10&t=26934

Artefact Phoenix Knight Posts: 1393 Joined: Oct 24, 2007 00:00 Location: France - Rennes	by Artefact » Jun 20, 2011 18:55 Trishin wrote:Nothing more to discuss.